9/12/2023 0 Comments Mathematica for physics![]() candidate at the University of Cambridge and a consultant at Wolfram Research, found that this kind of model could reproduce some of the aspects of quantum theory and Einstein’s general theory of relativity, the two fundamental pillars of modern physics.īut Wolfram’s model’s ability to incorporate currently accepted physics is not necessarily that impressive. “And this got me thinking: Could the universe work this way?” Wolfram and his collaborator Jonathan Gorard, a physics Ph.D. “Even when the underlying rules for a system are extremely simple, the behavior of the system as a whole can be essentially arbitrarily rich and complex,” he wrote in a blog post summarizing the idea. From the humble beginning of a small graph and a short set of rules, fabulously complex structures can rapidly appear. According to Wolfram, this graph is the fundamental stuff of the universe. This code acts on a graph, a network of points with connections between them, that grows and changes as the digital logic of the code clicks forward, one step at a time. Once again, physicists are unconvinced-in no small part, they say, because existing theories do a better job than his model.Īt its heart, Wolfram’s new approach is a computational picture of the cosmos-one where the fundamental rules that the universe obeys resemble lines of computer code. And that is where things remained-until last month, when, accompanied by breathless press coverage (and a 448-page preprint paper), Wolfram announced a possible “path to the fundamental theory of physics” based on his unconventional ideas. Their work carried on, and he went back to running his software company Wolfram Research. ![]() The book was an instant best seller and received glowing reviews: the New York Times called it “a first-class intellectual thrill.” But Wolfram’s arguments found few converts among scientists. They were successful.” Back in 2002, after years of labor, Wolfram self-published A New Kind of Science, a 1,200-page magnum opus detailing the general idea that nature runs on ultrasimple computational rules. “To be fair, I also fault some people in the physics community for trying to prevent it happening 20 years ago. ![]() “I do fault myself for not having done this 20 years ago,” the physicist turned software entrepreneur says. Stephen Wolfram blames himself for not changing the face of physics sooner. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |